Indirect vs Direct Procurement: Why Complexity Makes the Difference
In the world of corporate procurement, a fundamental distinction often separates two realms: direct procurement and indirect procurement.
In the world of corporate procurement, a fundamental distinction often separates two realms: direct procurement and indirect procurement. While the former generally enjoys greater recognition, the latter—often considered less strategic—actually reveals unexpected complexity and richness. This analysis, based on the field experience of a procurement director who has practiced both domains, will shed light on the real stakes of these two approaches.
Versatility: The Master Asset of Indirect Procurement
A Multi-Dimensional Expertise Required
Contrary to popular belief, indirect procurement demands exceptional versatility. As Marie-Laure, an experienced procurement director, points out: “In indirect procurement, you have to be good at a bit of everything and possess true buyer expertise. When you manage multiple categories, you must adapt to each one.”
This reality contrasts strongly with direct procurement, where specialization in a single category allows for deep but narrow expertise. In indirect procurement, you must navigate between:
IT services and their complex solutions
Intellectual services and their qualitative evaluation
General services and their impact on daily operations
Marketing purchases with their creative challenges
Financial services and their regulatory constraints
Continuous Learning as a Driving Force
This diversity is a stimulating challenge for procurement professionals. Marie-Laure captures this dynamic perfectly: “I like that moment when I don’t yet understand everything: I’ve been briefed, and I wonder if I’ll manage. Then you have to explore and learn to master the subject.”
This discovery phase, far from being an obstacle, becomes an advantage. It allows you to:
Develop valuable intellectual agility
Gain a cross-functional view of the company
Build expertise adaptable to different contexts
Negotiation Power: The Overlooked Advantage of Indirect Procurement
A Market More Open to Alternatives
One of the most striking paradoxes concerns negotiation power. While direct procurement appears more strategic, it often offers less room for maneuver. Marie-Laure explains: “In indirect procurement, you can replace a supplier and challenge the need itself. In direct procurement, when you buy well-selling brands, you don’t really have negotiation power and you become much more dependent.”
This reality is explained by several factors:
For direct procurement:
Dependence on brands and market trends
Strict technical or quality constraints
Limited number of qualified suppliers
Little flexibility on specifications
For indirect procurement:
Abundance of available alternatives
Possibility to redefine the need
Flexibility in proposed solutions
Ability to create competition
Challenging the Need: A Powerful Lever
The most strategic aspect of indirect procurement lies in the ability to challenge expressed needs. This approach allows you to:
Optimize costs by identifying alternative solutions
Improve processes by questioning established practices
Innovate by proposing different approaches
Create value beyond simple cost reduction
The Collaborative Dimension: Richness and Complexity
A Diverse Stakeholder Ecosystem
Indirect procurement involves collaboration with all departments of the company. This cross-functionality brings:
A global understanding of business challenges
Enriching relationships with varied profiles
Influence across the entire organization
Greater visibility within the company
Project Management at the Core
Unlike direct procurement, often driven by production cycles, indirect procurement revolves around specific projects. This project-based approach makes it possible to:
Structure optimization efforts
Measure tangible results
Involve stakeholders from the start
Celebrate successes in a concrete way
Key Skills to Excel in Indirect Procurement
Technical Skills
Financial analysis to assess proposals
Project management to lead initiatives
Advanced negotiation to maximize value
Market intelligence to identify opportunities
Behavioral Skills
Adaptability to diverse topics
Curiosity to understand new fields
Communication to convince stakeholders
Creativity to propose innovative solutions
Transforming the Perception of Indirect Procurement
It’s time to recognize the true value of indirect procurement. Far from being a secondary support function, it represents:
An exceptional learning ground
A source of substantial savings
A lever for corporate transformation
A school of versatility and agility
Indirect procurement professionals develop transferable skills and a strategic vision that make them key contributors to business performance.
Conclusion: Rethinking the Procurement Hierarchy
The traditional opposition between “noble” direct procurement and “secondary” indirect procurement does not withstand close analysis. The complexity, diversity, and opportunities offered by indirect procurement make it a demanding and rewarding field.
For finance and procurement professionals, this new perspective invites you to:
Give more recognition to indirect procurement teams
Invest in their development and tools
Acknowledge their strategic contribution
Fully leverage the opportunities they offer
Indirect procurement is not simply different from direct procurement—it is often more complex, richer, and offers more opportunities for value creation.
Ready to turn your indirect procurement into a competitive advantage? Discover how Freqens can help you automate your processes, identify savings opportunities, and maximize your negotiation power. Contact us for a personalized demonstration and join the companies that have already revolutionized their approach to indirect procurement.